DMARC policy · France large companies
What share of France large companies have a DMARC policy that is absent or monitor-only (p=none)?
65% of France large companies (95% CI 57.78–71.59%), measured across 180 companies on 2026-10-01.
Measured every Monday since 2026-08-01 — 1 observation to date. Last measured 2026-10-01.
How this is measured
Tier 0. TXT lookup at _dmarc.<domain>; parse the p= tag. Denominator: has_mx.
Passive measurement: a single DNS lookup, TLS handshake, or homepage GET per domain. Aggregate-only; no individual company is named. 95% Wilson confidence intervals. Population: national company registries (Companies House, Brreg, SIRENE), sampled by size band and resolved to email-active domains. Parked domains excluded. Snapshot: sirene-france-per600-seed20260730.
Licensed CC BY 4.0 — reuse with attribution to Quiet Failures. Download: JSON · CSV.
Check a specific domain against this control with the free Email authentication audit.
Why it matters
The flagship quiet failure. p=none is monitor mode — it publishes a record, generates reports, and instructs receivers to deliver forged mail anyway. It looks like DMARC in every compliance checklist and questionnaire while providing no protection. malformed is the same failure by accident.
Limits of this measurement
A domain may be mid-rollout in none deliberately; we measure the state, not intent.
The same check, other segments
- South Korea (domains)98.91%
- Italy (domains)94.93%
- Japan (domains)94.79%
- Russia (domains)94.09%
- Ukraine (domains)93.61%
- Finland (domains)92.45%
- Hungary (domains)92.36%
- Israel (domains)92%
Show the remaining 65 segments
- Vietnam (domains)91.41%
- Czechia (domains)91.39%
- Lithuania (domains)91.19%
- Austria (domains)90.97%
- Hong Kong (domains)90.83%
- the US (domains)90.52%
- Argentina (domains)90.48%
- Chile (domains)89.88%
- Indonesia (domains)89.8%
- France (domains)89.55%
- Canada (domains)89.52%
- Romania (domains)89.47%
- Bulgaria (domains)89.37%
- Slovenia (domains)89.29%
- the UK (domains)89.23%
- UK micro companies89.13%
- Mexico (domains)88.89%
- Sweden (domains)88.55%
- New Zealand (domains)88.28%
- Taiwan (domains)88%
- Ireland (domains)87.74%
- Croatia (domains)87.24%
- India (domains)87.08%
- Australia (domains)86.67%
- the UAE (domains)86.61%
- Spain (domains)86.27%
- Iceland (domains)85.78%
- global domains85.72%
- Thailand (domains)85.47%
- Belgium (domains)85.03%
- South Africa (domains)85.02%
- Estonia (domains)85%
- Brazil (domains)84.58%
- UK dormant companies84.02%
- Singapore (domains)83.61%
- Peru (domains)83.41%
- UK newly-formed (no accounts filed) companies83.01%
- Slovakia (domains)82.99%
- Latvia (domains)82.99%
- France micro companies82.97%
- Luxembourg (domains)82.05%
- UK small companies82%
- Denmark (domains)81.78%
- Turkey (domains)81.08%
- Malaysia (domains)80.37%
- the EU (domains)80.36%
- France small companies79.84%
- Saudi Arabia (domains)78.36%
- UK companies78.24%
- Portugal (domains)77.9%
- France companies76.45%
- the Philippines (domains)76.07%
- the Netherlands (domains)75.27%
- Norway small companies75.1%
- France medium companies75%
- Greece (domains)74.91%
- Norway micro companies74.1%
- Poland (domains)72.77%
- Germany (domains)70.87%
- UK medium & large companies70.5%
- Norway (domains)67.29%
- Norway companies67.17%
- Switzerland (domains)64.63%
- Norway medium companies61.28%
- Norway large companies54.92%